Steve Darcis vs Nicolas Mahut Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W L W W L L
Form
L W L L W L W W L LHead-To-Head: Darcis 2 - 0 Mahut
They have played 4 sets in total, with Darcis winning 4 and Mahut winning 0. The last match between Darcis and Mahut was at the Rennes Challenger, 12-10-2014, Final, I.hard with Steve Darcis getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Steve Darcis | 2 |
| Nicolas Mahut | 0 |
Rennes Challenger(12-10-2014)
6
2
6
4
| Darcis | Stats | Mahut |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 38 | Highest Rank | 37 |
| 41 | Age | 43 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 20 | Titles | 16 |
| 64% (560-318) | Career Total W/L | 55% (546-450) |
| $1,386,982 | Career Prize Money | $2,914,710 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kudermetova VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Goffin VS Muller PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Steve Darcis
Player
Nicolas Mahut
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
9
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Nicolas Mahut
48%
(
30 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
27 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 13 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:20:21 | Average Match Time | 1:20:21 |
| 55% (61/110) | 1st Serve % | 63% (85/134) |
| 79% (48/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (54/85) |
| 53% (26/49) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (14/49) |
| 69% (9/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (3/8) |
| 49% (66/134) | Return Points Win % | 33% (36/110) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Steve Darcis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Elliot Benchetrit
Player
Steve Darcis
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Steve Darcis
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Cameron Norrie
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Alexander Cozbinov
58%
(
66 of
113)
1st Serve %
62%
(
72 of
116)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
43%
(
49 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
116)
120
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Nick Kyrgios
Player
Steve Darcis
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
22
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
100%
(
42 of
42)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
34 of
38)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
8 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Santiago Giraldo
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jiri Vesely
Player
Steve Darcis
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
19
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
3
87%
(
40 of
46)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
39 of
46)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
19 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Lloyd Harris
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
6
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Illya Marchenko
47%
(
54 of
116)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
103)
9
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
50 of
61)
56%
(
35 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
38 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
112
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
49%
(
45 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
10
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Nicolas Mahut Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Nicolas Mahut
62%
(
61 of
98)
1st Serve %
51%
(
41 of
80)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
3 of
18)
42%
(
41 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Nicolas Mahut
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve %
42%
(
14 of
33)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
5 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
36
Total Points Won
22
|
6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Mahut
Player
Luke Saville
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
44%
(
26 of
59)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Nicolas Mahut
Player
Dennis Novak
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
12
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 14-11 13-15 15-14 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 1-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (560/318) | Win/Loss | 55% (546/450) |
| 61% (1275/823) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1301/1137) |
| 54% (10768/9335) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (12569/12018) |
| 57% (91/68) | Hard Win/Loss | 49% (143/146) |
| 67% (278/134) | Clay Win/Loss | 37% (48/82) |
| 65% (169/92) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (240/160) |
| 48% (22/24) | Grass Win/Loss | 65% (115/62) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.38 |
| 2172 | Aces Total | 4543 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1070 | Total Double Faults | 2019 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 569.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 538.11 |
| 61% (24425/40299) | 1st Serve % | 61% (28510/46617) |
| 70% (17205/24425) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (21160/28510) |
| 52% (8250/15879) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (9333/18280) |
| 43% (1668/3877) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (1432/3727) |
| 39% (15734/40287) | Return Points Win % | 36% (16810/47158) |
| 51% (45/43) | Slam W/L | 47% (64/72) |
| 39% (11/17) | Masters W/L | 43% (53/71) |
| 66% (25/13) | Cups W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 56% (114/88) | Main Tour W/L | 55% (192/159) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (272/131) | Challenger W/L | 62% (231/143) |
| 79% (91/24) | Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) |
| 66% (522/785) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (503/899) |
| 44% (32/72) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 41% (35/85) |
| 59% (187/318) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (247/506) |
| 58% (149/259) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (168/329) |
| 87% (533/466) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (527/452) |
| 12% (533/65) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (527/74) |
| 28% (345/95) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (469/92) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
